|
Post by stuart on May 10, 2019 1:02:28 GMT -8
Had some time today to update....
7A28, 7A38 and 7T12. The 7T12 is 2 seconds fast, with all the 7A28 and 7A38 being fast - only the black 7A38 with the orange hand is 1 second fast
Quite a wide variation in the 7C46 and 7549 with all being slightly fast - the top right being about 1 second fast, all the others a bit faster.
An oldly disappointing Omega X33 being 2 seconds slow, the Omega 1620 was set to date so I missed the seconds in this picture but it is +1sec which is the same as when it started.
|
|
|
Post by Groundhog66 on May 10, 2019 10:03:28 GMT -8
Great contest, love the thread.
|
|
camrok
Needs a Life!
Posts: 2,418
|
Post by camrok on May 13, 2019 2:24:05 GMT -8
Here is a graph:
Or
|
|
camrok
Needs a Life!
Posts: 2,418
|
Post by camrok on May 13, 2019 3:14:31 GMT -8
It appears folks we have a winner. acidstain with a serviced 7c43. Congratulations. I will keep the spreadsheet going and hope we can refer to it every now and again. I hope to start a results section when all the results are in. Thanks all for your entries. Cam
|
|
Mr.Jones
Needs a Life!
Hamburg, Germany
Posts: 4,679
|
Post by Mr.Jones on May 13, 2019 3:30:03 GMT -8
Thanks for running it, Cam! And it seems I have the biggest... time difference.
|
|
|
Post by 69ChevelleSS on May 13, 2019 6:09:48 GMT -8
|
|
mikeyt
Needs a Life!
Krusty Olde Pharte
Posts: 4,821
|
Post by mikeyt on May 13, 2019 10:39:06 GMT -8
Thanks, Cam. My middle of the pack finish with a $20 Casio just goes to show that you don't need to spend a bucket full of money to have a reasonably accurate watch.
|
|
pip
WS Benefactor
Berkshire, UK
Posts: 6,174
|
Post by pip on May 13, 2019 13:11:33 GMT -8
Great stuff Cam, and apologies about my two non-entered watches as I had forgotten about them. They are currently: 7T92: -04 seconds 8243: +25 seconds Sorry Cam, can’t seem to edit the spreadsheet from my iPad.
|
|
mikeyt
Needs a Life!
Krusty Olde Pharte
Posts: 4,821
|
Post by mikeyt on May 13, 2019 15:12:00 GMT -8
This was a late arrival--I just received it on May 6th, and set it to my RC clock. Checked it today with nist and it was dead nutz. I'll track it for a few weeks, maybe it'll beat my Casio. Maybe I'll learn to beat the reflections, too.
|
|
|
Post by 3Pedals6Speeds on May 13, 2019 17:56:53 GMT -8
Here is a graph:
Or Confused on the logic of who made the plot and who didn't....
|
|
ausimax
Timekeeper
Kogan, Qld, Australia
Posts: 937
|
Post by ausimax on May 13, 2019 19:49:43 GMT -8
Congratulations to acidstain, and thanks for a great contest Cam.
Getting in in 6th place with a run of the mill calibre movement leaves me feeling quite chuffed.
|
|
tritto
WS Benefactor
Posts: 5,872
|
Post by tritto on May 13, 2019 20:38:36 GMT -8
Interesting to note that the majority were gaining time, especially the more inaccurate ones. Excellent idea, Cam. Thanks for putting the competition together.
|
|
|
Post by acidstain on May 13, 2019 21:05:28 GMT -8
Still going strong That Guy works wonders
|
|
camrok
Needs a Life!
Posts: 2,418
|
Post by camrok on May 13, 2019 22:21:25 GMT -8
|
|
Mr.Jones
Needs a Life!
Hamburg, Germany
Posts: 4,679
|
Post by Mr.Jones on May 14, 2019 0:46:49 GMT -8
Confused on the logic of who made the plot and who didn't.... That's because Cam entered the values manually for the graph - and forgot you. I took the liberty of adding your entry: (But maybe I missed somebody else as well? Gotta check the sheet...)
|
|
camrok
Needs a Life!
Posts: 2,418
|
Post by camrok on May 14, 2019 1:06:47 GMT -8
3Pedals6Speeds there was no logic in you missing the cut in fact the opposite. I was very eager to have a publicly hosted spreadsheet as data entry and spreadsheets are not my strength. Mr.Jones has made some adjustments and I think he may address my sum formula to address some issues I sorta solved manually. Sorry for missing your entry it was not intentional.
|
|
Mr.Jones
Needs a Life!
Hamburg, Germany
Posts: 4,679
|
Post by Mr.Jones on May 14, 2019 1:38:27 GMT -8
As camrok said, I meddled a bit in the spreadsheet (somehow my accuracy is now the best... - nope, still the worst.) and updated the "mechanics" in the background a bit. Here is the current "final" version:
|
|
camrok
Needs a Life!
Posts: 2,418
|
Post by camrok on May 14, 2019 1:42:35 GMT -8
As camrok said, I meddled a bit in the spreadsheet (somehow my accuracy is now the best... - nope, still the worst.) and updated the "mechanics" in the background a bit. Here is the current "final" version: Perfect I’m looking forward to look at the functions you used. I spent about 45min googling how to do it and it resulted in @3pedals6speed dropping off the chart. Thank you that is awesome.
|
|
Mr.Jones
Needs a Life!
Hamburg, Germany
Posts: 4,679
|
Post by Mr.Jones on May 14, 2019 2:17:35 GMT -8
Another chart: The most accurate watches in the competition (or: "I should have picked THAT one").
|
|
tritto
WS Benefactor
Posts: 5,872
|
Post by tritto on Sept 11, 2019 22:05:40 GMT -8
About four months after the start of this competition, I'm still running at +6.8 seconds per month. Very stable given the first month was rounded to 7s.
|
|