|
Post by frogman4me on Jun 20, 2013 7:40:56 GMT -8
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 20, 2013 8:11:31 GMT -8
Honestly, if you absolutely must keep only one of them my vote goes towards you keeping the 62MAS. your's is in great condition and very difficult to locate another as clean/well aged.
The 6105 is also nice, but the lume color is hard to swallow for me and I can routinely locate clean original examples.
Fow what it's worth, just an opinion.
In the end, it really comes down to your personal feelings about them. Which one speaks loudest to you "wear me"
|
|
donciccio
Is a Permanent Fixture
Posts: 6,160
|
Post by donciccio on Jun 20, 2013 8:14:41 GMT -8
First. Sleep on it. Before you decide to let either one go ... SLEEP ON IT!
If you still feel the same I'd say keep the 62MAS. They are harder to come by and it would be one that is difficult to replace if you feel regret later down the road.
|
|
|
Post by seikoholic on Jun 20, 2013 8:15:46 GMT -8
Wow, that's a tough tough choice.
I'd keep the 62mas. Far rarer, especially in that condition, and it's value is going up every single day.
That lume color on the 6105 is fantastic IMO - too bad one has to go. I'd keep both.
|
|
dasher
Timekeeper
Waiting on 6:00 pm
Posts: 966
|
Post by dasher on Jun 20, 2013 8:22:58 GMT -8
Keep the 62mas, for sure! Both are beautiful though. Do sleep on it, though, I agree.
Dan.
|
|
|
Post by proofproof on Jun 20, 2013 8:28:50 GMT -8
Keep both. In the long run the money spent on the 6105 probably wasn't all that much (don't know when you bought), and if you want another one down the road it won't be any less expensive.
|
|
sdoocms
Is a Permanent Fixture
Carl
Posts: 5,296
|
Post by sdoocms on Jun 20, 2013 8:31:53 GMT -8
If you have to let one go then keep the 62mas. It looks to be in great condition. drooling-sign-smiley-emoticon
|
|
cartshed
WIS
Veins of Vodka
Posts: 1,918
|
Post by cartshed on Jun 20, 2013 8:36:31 GMT -8
I'm going to say keep the 62mas as well. It'll be much easier to find another 6105 in the future if you want to.
That is, unless you want to give away your 62mas to a good home. a176
|
|
|
Post by cannop on Jun 20, 2013 8:39:27 GMT -8
Keep the 62mas David, then give me the 6105. Sorted!
|
|
|
Post by frogman4me on Jun 20, 2013 8:40:26 GMT -8
The 6105 is also nice, but the lume color is hard to swallow for me and I can routinely locate clean original examples. To be honest the patina/wabi is the reason why it was one of my favorite watches. I had a few 6105 with the traditional patina and to be honest it was a little boring so I sold them and kept this one with the unusual patina.
|
|
|
Post by frogman4me on Jun 20, 2013 8:45:23 GMT -8
Keep the 62mas David, then give me the 6105. Sorted! Hey Duncan! I have so much interest in the 6105, every time I post a photo of it I get inquires about it. Send me an email and I will let you know what has been going on with it.
|
|
|
Post by estrickland on Jun 20, 2013 9:10:23 GMT -8
Stunning group of 150m divers.
I'd try to keep both, and move the other 6105-8000 - bigger bezel ding on that one, and it'd be easier to replace down the road.
Agree with the group that if I had to keep one, it'd be the '62Mas. Just a fantastic example.
|
|
rehunk
Can't Tell Time
Blah, blah, blah..............Ron
Posts: 17
|
Post by rehunk on Jun 20, 2013 9:20:10 GMT -8
I don't think that I can add very much to what has already been said. You've got two really nice examples there and only you know heart of hearts which one to keep. Seems the consensus is to keep the 62mas and I wouldn't disagree. I'm on the scout for one myself and good examples like yours are scarce or too pricey (for me anyways). Not a choice I envy having to make. Tough one but good luck.
|
|
|
Post by kingrat on Jun 20, 2013 9:56:05 GMT -8
The Lume on that 6105 is probably the best I've ever seen....but if you have to keep just 1 of those beauties it would have to be the 62mas
|
|
bc
Newb
Posts: 53
|
Post by bc on Jun 20, 2013 10:08:19 GMT -8
As others have said, the 62mas simply because it's harder to replace...in terms of looks I prefer the 6105
|
|
|
Post by timewatcher on Jun 20, 2013 10:13:33 GMT -8
As others have said, the 62mas simply because it's harder to replace...in terms of looks I prefer the 6105 I agree!
|
|
|
Post by funkster on Jun 20, 2013 10:43:17 GMT -8
Both stunning watches - I would keep both!
|
|
|
Post by DAHASCO on Jun 20, 2013 10:46:28 GMT -8
Keep the 62 .....
|
|
|
Post by 69ChevelleSS on Jun 20, 2013 10:55:18 GMT -8
Sell one of your n**s and keep both! That's what I'd do>
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 20, 2013 16:30:17 GMT -8
I like the case of the 6105 8000 .
|
|