|
Post by huangcjz on Jun 6, 2020 9:07:12 GMT -8
We all love our classic vintage Seikos, which got me thinking - what modern Seikos do you think will be seen as classics?
I guess the SKX007/SKX009, though its design from the 7548 originally is already 42 years old.
The modern Alpinist - the first SCVF Alpinists are from 1995, so are 25 years old. (I consider them separately to the original ones, though those are also classic, since they are so different - they only really share a name).
The Monster, though first introduced in 1996, is 24 years old.
The SARB033/SARB035, etc., introduced in I think 2010, were preceded by the Seiko Spirit SCVS003 etc. in I think 2006, so the design is 14 years old.
The Cocktail Time design, SARB065/SARB066/SARB068, first introduced in 2010, is 10 years old.
For Grand Seiko, I guess the Snowflake - though the dial is not originally modern, the Spring Drive movement and titanium case are.
I see the MM300, MM200, and PROSPEX LX watches, as 6159 modern re-interpretations/derivatives, and the SLA017 and 6RMAS as modern re-interpretations/62MAS derivatives, so not as truly original modern designs.
The enamel-dialled PRESAGEs are modern re-interpretations of the Laurel, Seiko’s first wrist-watch from 1913.
Perhaps the Sumo?
Those are my opinions. Some people have mentioned the Transocean or Spork as well.
Can anyone else think of any other examples?
|
|
raz
WS Benefactor
Posts: 1,798
|
Post by raz on Jun 6, 2020 23:07:52 GMT -8
I was thinking of this recently As a result I bought an SKX and a gen 2 black monster with no intention to flip them The sarbs 017/033/035 along with the sbdx001/017 will be sought after despite big production runs. Although they do relate to other models from the past they are quite unique reinterpretations. The new versions of these imho somehow have lost their charm. In terms of entry level divers I believe the first earlier versions of the: monster, stargate, sumo, shogun, samurai will be classics despite the myriad of reiterations/colors that are constantly appearing like mushrooms after rain....
|
|
cobrajet25
Needs a Life!
"Underweared curmudgeon!"
Posts: 3,357
|
Post by cobrajet25 on Jun 7, 2020 0:03:59 GMT -8
The Monster, though first introduced in 1996, is 24 years old.
I am pretty sure these came out in the early 2000s sometime.
|
|
|
Post by huangcjz on Jun 7, 2020 1:09:00 GMT -8
|
|
cobrajet25
Needs a Life!
"Underweared curmudgeon!"
Posts: 3,357
|
Post by cobrajet25 on Jun 7, 2020 4:41:04 GMT -8
No problem! I remember buying the black one in the early 2000s when this model was still new...and controversial. Never took to it, so I sold it. A few years later, I bought the orange version under the mistaken belief that the problem I had with the watch was the color of the dial. It wasn't the problem, and I traded the orange one for a white C300 Navihawk.
Wish I had kept both of them!
|
|
jpc3
Newb
Learning more every day
Posts: 43
|
Post by jpc3 on Jun 8, 2020 6:26:23 GMT -8
I was thinking of this recently As a result I bought an SKX and a gen 2 black monster with no intention to flip them The sarbs 017/033/035 along with the sbdx001/017 will be sought after despite big production runs. Although they do relate to other models from the past they are quite unique reinterpretations. The new versions of these imho somehow have lost their charm. In terms of entry level divers I believe the first earlier versions of the: monster, stargate, sumo, shogun, samurai will be classics despite the myriad of reiterations/colors that are constantly appearing like mushrooms after rain.... +1 for the First Gen Stargate
|
|
Fergus
Needs a Life!
Posts: 2,949
Member is Online
|
Post by Fergus on Jun 8, 2020 23:56:18 GMT -8
Some seem to think their SKX007/009 are because recent listings of £400+ appear regularly. Of course we do not know what they eventually accept for them.
|
|