Review - Timefactors SMITHS “Baby” Willard PRS-68
Aug 17, 2020 7:19:53 GMT -8
via Tapatalk
Groundhog66, HiBeat, and 6 more like this
Post by leffemonster on Aug 17, 2020 7:19:53 GMT -8
I’ve long admired Timefactors SMITHS offerings but never taken the plunge. A couple of weeks ago I was browsing the website and came across their latest offerings - “baby” versions of the PRS-68 Willard, PRS-52 Dreadnought and PRS-51 Speedbird.
I spent a long time looking at the photographs, reading the specs and trying to convince myself that I didn’t want any of them. But, in the end, I succumbed and weighed in for both the PRS-68 ‘Baby’ Willard and PRS-52 ‘Baby’ Dreadnought. Both arrived today after a 2 week wait and I thought I’d share the Willard with you.
Both watches came in a very nice individual travel case, rather like a glasses case.
Opening the zipper reveals a branded polishing cloth hiding the watch beneath.
As the name suggests, it’s essentially a homage to the SEIKO 6105-8110, which Timefactors have already done - but this one is smaller. The original PRS-68 had a 44.5mm case and 20mm lug width whereas the ‘Baby’ has a 40.6mm case and 18mm lug width.
Some specs -
Sapphire crystal with AR coating, 2.5mm
Uni-directional 120 click bezel, ceramic insert with Super Luminova X1-C3
Black dial with luminous hour markers
Bevelled rectangular luminous-filled hands
316L stainless steel case
Stainless steel Jubilee bracelet, milled clasp, screwed links and solid end links
Screw-down crown and caseback
The movement in the original PRS-68 was a Miyota, latterly the 9015, whereas the Baby comes with a Seiko Instruments NE15C- so basically a 6R15C movement. Hand-winding is as smooth as you’d expect from a 6R15, and the automatic winding feels smooth with no discernible sound from the rotor.
Now, I don’t know if Eddie Platts has all movements regulated before assembling, but this one shows some pretty impressive numbers -
The signed crown has a nice smooth action, locking after about 3 turns. It’s a little tricky to turn as it gets closer to the case due to the crown guards, but manageable. The bracelet is very nice indeed - solid end-links, with screwed links which makes sizing the bracelet a doddle (assuming you have a 1.2mm screwdriver). The milled clasp is a nice touch as well and something normally not found at this price level. Also pleasing to see is plenty of micro-adjustment available on the clasp with a total of 6 positions available.
The finish on the case is superb with sharp case lines and a nice mix of polished and brushed surfaces. The bezel action is firm and I suspect would probably ease up a little with more use, but it’ll be staying put on mine. The ceramic insert looks very impressive as well. Overall height comes in at 13.65mm.
I had to remove 5 links to size it to my 6.75” wrist, so how does it wear?
The answer is - very well indeed. Nicely balanced and well proportioned given the case size and bracelet width combination. For those with thicker wrists I suppose it might wear a little small, especially at 18mm, but for me it’s just about spot-on.
Here it is compared to an SRP789 -
When you look at the pictures it’s clear there’s quite a difference in sizing, but on the wrist it doesn’t feel quite as much of a difference somehow.
Overall I’m very impressed with it, and I’m glad I pulled the trigger. Is it as good as the SPB151? I’ve no idea. Undoubtedly some people will say not, as it’s not a genuine SEIKO. I know some won’t like the SMITHS because it’s ‘just another knock-off’. From my perspective, I’m judging it based on what I know - and that’s the watch I bought. I don’t have (or ever likely to have) an original 6105 to compare it against. I haven’t got an SPB151. I don’t have any NH35-powered Chinese homage to compare it with either. I think it’s an absolutely belting watch with some impressive specs behind it, especially for the price, and for my wrist it’s pretty much a perfect fit.
I know Timefactors aren’t everyone’s cup of tea, at least reading some of the older posts on here, but I take as I find. This was my first experience of buying from them and I wouldn’t hesitate to do it again. I think the Baby Willard is a cracking timepiece for £335 and I’m glad it’s in my collection.
Thanks for reading folks!
I spent a long time looking at the photographs, reading the specs and trying to convince myself that I didn’t want any of them. But, in the end, I succumbed and weighed in for both the PRS-68 ‘Baby’ Willard and PRS-52 ‘Baby’ Dreadnought. Both arrived today after a 2 week wait and I thought I’d share the Willard with you.
Both watches came in a very nice individual travel case, rather like a glasses case.
Opening the zipper reveals a branded polishing cloth hiding the watch beneath.
As the name suggests, it’s essentially a homage to the SEIKO 6105-8110, which Timefactors have already done - but this one is smaller. The original PRS-68 had a 44.5mm case and 20mm lug width whereas the ‘Baby’ has a 40.6mm case and 18mm lug width.
Some specs -
Sapphire crystal with AR coating, 2.5mm
Uni-directional 120 click bezel, ceramic insert with Super Luminova X1-C3
Black dial with luminous hour markers
Bevelled rectangular luminous-filled hands
316L stainless steel case
Stainless steel Jubilee bracelet, milled clasp, screwed links and solid end links
Screw-down crown and caseback
The movement in the original PRS-68 was a Miyota, latterly the 9015, whereas the Baby comes with a Seiko Instruments NE15C- so basically a 6R15C movement. Hand-winding is as smooth as you’d expect from a 6R15, and the automatic winding feels smooth with no discernible sound from the rotor.
Now, I don’t know if Eddie Platts has all movements regulated before assembling, but this one shows some pretty impressive numbers -
The signed crown has a nice smooth action, locking after about 3 turns. It’s a little tricky to turn as it gets closer to the case due to the crown guards, but manageable. The bracelet is very nice indeed - solid end-links, with screwed links which makes sizing the bracelet a doddle (assuming you have a 1.2mm screwdriver). The milled clasp is a nice touch as well and something normally not found at this price level. Also pleasing to see is plenty of micro-adjustment available on the clasp with a total of 6 positions available.
The finish on the case is superb with sharp case lines and a nice mix of polished and brushed surfaces. The bezel action is firm and I suspect would probably ease up a little with more use, but it’ll be staying put on mine. The ceramic insert looks very impressive as well. Overall height comes in at 13.65mm.
I had to remove 5 links to size it to my 6.75” wrist, so how does it wear?
The answer is - very well indeed. Nicely balanced and well proportioned given the case size and bracelet width combination. For those with thicker wrists I suppose it might wear a little small, especially at 18mm, but for me it’s just about spot-on.
Here it is compared to an SRP789 -
When you look at the pictures it’s clear there’s quite a difference in sizing, but on the wrist it doesn’t feel quite as much of a difference somehow.
Overall I’m very impressed with it, and I’m glad I pulled the trigger. Is it as good as the SPB151? I’ve no idea. Undoubtedly some people will say not, as it’s not a genuine SEIKO. I know some won’t like the SMITHS because it’s ‘just another knock-off’. From my perspective, I’m judging it based on what I know - and that’s the watch I bought. I don’t have (or ever likely to have) an original 6105 to compare it against. I haven’t got an SPB151. I don’t have any NH35-powered Chinese homage to compare it with either. I think it’s an absolutely belting watch with some impressive specs behind it, especially for the price, and for my wrist it’s pretty much a perfect fit.
I know Timefactors aren’t everyone’s cup of tea, at least reading some of the older posts on here, but I take as I find. This was my first experience of buying from them and I wouldn’t hesitate to do it again. I think the Baby Willard is a cracking timepiece for £335 and I’m glad it’s in my collection.
Thanks for reading folks!