|
Post by Groundhog66 on Oct 26, 2014 8:23:18 GMT -8
I was watching THIS one, pretty hefty price, for a piece that is not all original. Have a look at the bidders, some shilling going on?
|
|
|
Post by seikoholic on Oct 26, 2014 8:32:58 GMT -8
One zero-feedback bidder:
Another zero-feedbackbidder:
So...
|
|
Thomas
WIS
Nun Gut
Posts: 1,480
|
Post by Thomas on Oct 26, 2014 8:46:50 GMT -8
It looks like it had a weird re-lume to me, with those hard edged "cakes".
What do you folks think?
- Thomas
|
|
|
Post by pollythecat on Oct 26, 2014 9:28:48 GMT -8
That is a sham and so blatant, why doesn't the seller list with a BIN only if he is so uptight about getting 'his' price for it?
|
|
Thomas
WIS
Nun Gut
Posts: 1,480
|
Post by Thomas on Oct 26, 2014 10:28:29 GMT -8
That is a sham and so blatant, why doesn't the seller list with a BIN only if he is so uptight about getting 'his' price for it? Or a high minimum bid, seems the best of both worlds... - Thomas
|
|
sdoocms
Is a Permanent Fixture
Carl
Posts: 5,296
|
Post by sdoocms on Oct 26, 2014 10:32:22 GMT -8
And I have had people tell me the one that I have listed with AF parts is over priced. He's $175 higher!
|
|
longbike
Is a Permanent Fixture
Aqualand Addict
Posts: 6,409
|
Post by longbike on Oct 26, 2014 10:36:34 GMT -8
That is a sham and so blatant, why doesn't the seller list with a BIN only if he is so uptight about getting 'his' price for it? That is it , Mike that's a .RECOND. watch it looks like.
|
|
|
Post by Benchdweller on Oct 26, 2014 12:02:43 GMT -8
Its all original except for the insert and not re-lumed so I'd say it finished at a fair price.... The bidding history is very suspect though.
|
|
|
Post by 69ChevelleSS on Oct 26, 2014 13:44:05 GMT -8
Its all original except for the insert and not re-lumed so I'd say it finished at a fair price.... The bidding history is very suspect though. HMMMM . . . I'm surprised . . . I would have bet a fair sum that the dial was relumed. Can you explain (and I mean this sincerely) what makes you judge it to be original. I thought it a relume because the round indices look like hockey pucks (hey, that's the best I could come up with) whereas all the original Seikos that I've seen were more dome like (higher in the middle then sloping down to meet the flat surface of the dial). I am interested in learning and not trying to start any crap.
|
|
|
Post by philsinclair on Oct 26, 2014 14:10:37 GMT -8
Hi guys. Suggest there is no sale there, just one of his shill bidders taking it out. Bugger those fees, that stuff this scam a bit. Cheers Phil
|
|
|
Post by Groundhog66 on Oct 26, 2014 14:48:50 GMT -8
Its all original except for the insert and not re-lumed so I'd say it finished at a fair price.... The bidding history is very suspect though. Crystal is AM as well, not a big deal to some...But for that price, it should be all original IMO.
|
|
|
Post by Benchdweller on Oct 26, 2014 16:23:55 GMT -8
Its all original except for the insert and not re-lumed so I'd say it finished at a fair price.... The bidding history is very suspect though. HMMMM . . . I'm surprised . . . I would have bet a fair sum that the dial was relumed. Can you explain (and I mean this sincerely) what makes you judge it to be original. Check out the textured finish to the lume, it looks like it was applied to a piece of cloth and then pressed onto the dial. That's the tell-tale sign that the lume (and also the dial) on this one is original. I've yet to see another dial, Seiko or otherwise, where the lume finish is the same although there are many genuine 6309 dials where the textured finish is less pronounced. ...all the original Seikos that I've seen were more dome like (higher in the middle then sloping down to meet the flat surface of the dial). In the case of the divers such as 6309's or SKX's the lume should be an even thickness from centre to edge. There are plenty of Seiko dials which have dome shaped lume plots but not on the diver models as far as I'm aware...
|
|
|
Post by Benchdweller on Oct 26, 2014 17:08:03 GMT -8
Its all original except for the insert and not re-lumed so I'd say it finished at a fair price.... The bidding history is very suspect though. Crystal is AM as well, not a big deal to some...But for that price, it should be all original IMO. Good spot on the crystal as it should have the frosted edge, but then I'd prefer a new a/m crystal rather than a scratched original and I'd guess most ebay buyers are probably the same. As for the price, its not a bad advert with claims of a recent service ( ), decent pics and worldwide shipping... I've sold worse 6309's on ebay for the same money and had better ones go for less so I think $425 for this one is in the right ballpark, especially if the servicing claims are to be believed. As for what all original examples are going for these days, here's one I sold recently and here's a similar one which I had on my watch list and finished this evening. 12 months ago I would have said $450 was top money for a nice and original 6309 but not today if you advertise it right.
|
|
|
Post by Groundhog66 on Oct 26, 2014 17:12:30 GMT -8
Crystal is AM as well, not a big deal to some...But for that price, it should be all original IMO. Good spot on the crystal as it should have the frosted edge, but then I'd prefer a new a/m crystal rather than a scratched original and I'd guess most ebay buyers are probably the same. As for the price, its not a bad advert with claims of a recent service ( ), decent pics and worldwide shipping... I've sold worse 6309's on ebay for the same money and had better ones go for less so I think $425 for this one is in the right ballpark, especially if the servicing claims are to be believed. As for what all original examples are going for these days, here's one I sold recently and here's a similar one which I had on my watch list and finished this evening. 12 months ago I would have said $450 was top money for an original 6309 but not today if you advertise it right. IMO, for that price, it should have an original unmarked crystal. Damn, you found a sucker to buy that one...wow. Some folks don't have a clue, I've gotten much better examples for a whole lot less. I guess like cockroach said, watches in the UK are just more expansive.
|
|
|
Post by Benchdweller on Oct 26, 2014 17:43:02 GMT -8
Damn, you found a sucker to buy that one...wow. Some folks don't have a clue, I've gotten much better examples for a whole lot less. I guess like cockroach said, watches in the UK are just more expansive. On the contrary, I'd say that some folks are now getting clued up about these and that's been driving the prices up lately, certainly with the all original examples. I was hoping for £300 when I listed mine and I did think the buyer overpaid at £470, but when the other one fetched £480 a few weeks later.... Maybe the buyers were a sucker for the grey lume but I strongly believe that if you want to know what something's worth then stick it on ebay with worldwide postage and let the market decide.
|
|
|
Post by Groundhog66 on Oct 26, 2014 17:49:56 GMT -8
Damn, you found a sucker to buy that one...wow. Some folks don't have a clue, I've gotten much better examples for a whole lot less. I guess like cockroach said, watches in the UK are just more expansive. On the contrary, I'd say that some folks are now getting clued up about these and that's been driving the prices up lately, certainly with the all original examples. I was hoping for £300 when I listed mine and I did think the buyer overpaid at £470, but when the other one fetched £480 a few weeks later.... Maybe the buyers were a sucker for the grey lume but I strongly believe that if you want to know what something's worth then stick it on ebay with worldwide postage and let the market decide. You may see those prices on eBay UK, but not over here. You'd be hard pressed to find anyone in the US, that would pay you even close to $750+ for that example. Don't get me wrong, good for you...But yeah, the buyer definitely overpaid IMO.
|
|
|
Post by seikoholic on Oct 26, 2014 19:24:19 GMT -8
Just an FYI / PSA, not all A/M crystals are created the same. Our A/M 6309 & 7548 crystals, 320W34GN00, are exact duplicates of the originals, down to the frosted side and bevel. Wonderful clarity as well.
|
|
|
Post by Benchdweller on Oct 26, 2014 19:45:01 GMT -8
You may see those prices on eBay UK, but not over here. You'd be hard pressed to find anyone in the US, that would pay you even close to $750+ for that example. Don't get me wrong, good for you...But yeah, the buyer definitely overpaid IMO. It could well be that old Seiko's fetch more in the UK with it being a smaller market over here etc. Mine was offered worldwide but the buyer was from England... Or it could be that the classic vintage Seiko's such as 6309-7040's are now becoming more appreciated. I bought a H558 Arnie project watch last year thinking I could get it sorted for a total spend of £150ish and sell it for £200 or more. It took a fair bit more work and parts than I'd anticipated for and nine months later (Feb 14) I tried to sell it for the £280 that it owed me. It was gone within 24hrs and looking at the recent Arnie prices I should have asked for closer to £400. I guess my point is that I'm of the opinion that certain Seiko's are way undervalued right now and I think that certain models are due an adjustment in prices, with good 6309's being one of those models.
|
|
|
Post by Groundhog66 on Oct 26, 2014 19:52:10 GMT -8
You may see those prices on eBay UK, but not over here. You'd be hard pressed to find anyone in the US, that would pay you even close to $750+ for that example. Don't get me wrong, good for you...But yeah, the buyer definitely overpaid IMO. It could well be that old Seiko's fetch more in the UK with it being a smaller market over here etc. Mine was offered worldwide but the buyer was from England... Or it could be that the classic vintage Seiko's such as 6309-7040's are now becoming more appreciated. I bought a H558 Arnie project watch last year thinking I could get it sorted for a total spend of £150ish and sell it for £200 or more. It took a fair bit more work and parts than I'd anticipated for and nine months later (Feb 14) I tried to sell it for the £280 that it owed me. It was gone within 24hrs and looking at the recent Arnie prices I should have asked for closer to £400. I guess my point is that I'm of the opinion that certain Seiko's are way undervalued right now and I think that certain models are due an adjustment in prices, with good 6309's being one of those models. It is what it is, but I will say this.....Whomever would pay over $750 for a 6309, that is not all original, and pretty fantastic, is out of their mind. I've never paid more than $325 for any of mine, and most of them are pretty fantastic.
|
|
|
Post by 69ChevelleSS on Oct 27, 2014 5:27:50 GMT -8
HMMMM . . . I'm surprised . . . I would have bet a fair sum that the dial was relumed. Can you explain (and I mean this sincerely) what makes you judge it to be original. Check out the textured finish to the lume, it looks like it was applied to a piece of cloth and then pressed onto the dial. That's the tell-tale sign that the lume (and also the dial) on this one is original. I've yet to see another dial, Seiko or otherwise, where the lume finish is the same although there are many genuine 6309 dials where the textured finish is less pronounced. ...all the original Seikos that I've seen were more dome like (higher in the middle then sloping down to meet the flat surface of the dial). In the case of the divers such as 6309's or SKX's the lume should be an even thickness from centre to edge. There are plenty of Seiko dials which have dome shaped lume plots but not on the diver models as far as I'm aware... Thanks for the education! I love the level of knowledge here and the willingness to share. As for the prices you linked to . . . perhaps it was the gray lume that pushed up the price? I love that look and wish mine would turn that color. It makes the watch look ultra cool! Congrats on your sale!
|
|